Aperture and Depth of Field
“In evidence photography, there is never a good reason to minimize the depth of field. The range of distances over which an image is acceptably sharp is one of the most important factors for the evidence photographer to learn[…].”
— Stanford Weiss, Handbook of Forensic Photography
[M]aximizing depth of field is a critical skill. The photographer must know the camera variables that affect depth of field and purposefully select the setting[s] so that it maximizes depth of field.”
— Edward Robinson, Crime Scene Photography
Photographers often use shallow depth of field to isolate a subject from the background. For instance, a portrait photographer may use a large aperture, like f/1.8, to make a model stand out against a blurred background. The technique draws attention to the main subject and tells the viewer what is important in the image. However, when we photograph a fire scene, the entire scene is our subject. All the details are important, even if we don’t realize it at the time that we capture an image. Have you ever reviewed scene photos and noticed something important in the background that made a difference in your case? If not, just wait. It’s bound to happen! You never know what small detail may be important. Therefore, the general rule for forensic imaging is to maximize the depth of field.
Providing adequate DOF in our images also ensures the admissibility of our images in court. According to the Federal Rules of Evidence, in order for a photograph to be admissible it must be a fair and accurate representation of the scene or the evidence it depicts. If large portions of the image are obscured (because of a shallow depth of field for instance) this may invite challenges to the image’s admissibility and provide fodder for an opposing attorney. “How can this be a fair and accurate depiction of the scene? The background is a blurry mess!” “Were you intentionally trying to hide evidence in the background of the photo? Or do you just not know how to take a good photograph?” It’s best to avoid questions like these by taking good quality forensic images. We can provide the greatest scene details and avoid potential admissibility pitfalls by shooting with a large f/number. Exactly how large that number needs to be depends on a couple factors.